Is Dave Ramsey’s Bad Advice Costing You Millions?

Dave Ramsey built an empire in part by telling people to pay off their homes in fifteen years. It’s become gospel in certain circles. For Dave, it made sense.  He was crushed by debt early in his career, nearly lost everything, and swore he’d never be that vulnerable again. That’s understandable.

But it’s also probably not your situation. Unfortunately Dave’s advice is optimized for Dave’s psychology, not necessarily for you or your finances. Dave needed the psychological win of being debt-free. But his bias could easily be costing you millions.

Understanding the opportunity cost

Say you locked in a $1,000,000 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at 3% (back when rates made that possible). The monthly payment on the mortgage is $4,216.04.

But Dave says to pay that mortgage off in fifteen years. To do so, you increase your monthly mortgage payment to $6,905.82. That’s an additional $2,690 a month.

The math of Dave’s way: you pay $6,905.82 a month and invest $0 until the end of year 15, when the house is fully paid off. At that point you funnel all of that money — the $6,905.82 — into investing through year 30.

The JD Investor’s way: you pay $4,216.04 a month, and instead of plowing the additional $2,690 a month into the mortgage, you invest it and earn a 10% compounding annual return. You do this through year 30.

Here’s the result:

See footnotes below for source and methodology

If you follow Dave’s path and pay off that million-dollar mortgage in fifteen years instead of letting it ride for thirty, using our assumptions you’d be more than $3 million poorer.

To be sure, the math assumes you can stomach a market that doesn’t move in a straight line. Ten percent is the long-run average, and certainly not a guarantee. If you’d panic-sell during a 2008-style or Covid like drawdown, the analytical case falls apart, you wouldn’t actually capture those returns.

Why paying off a house might still make sense

Here’s the nuance: for some lawyers, paying off the house in fifteen years — or even in cash — makes sense. Maybe you hate leverage as much as Dave. Maybe your income is volatile. Maybe you genuinely sleep better without debt. That’s valid.

The point is: you should choose that path based on the numbers, not because Dave said so.

I own a house with a 2.5% mortgage. I would love to own it free and clear. But my analytical mind won’t let me pay it off. At 56 years old, I expect to carry that mortgage for another 20 years. My thinking is that I would prefer to play the odds to be be meaningfully more wealthy – wealthy enough to afford a small mortgage – as opposed to being slightly less wealthy, with no mortgage.

Maybe your bias is different. But whatever you choose, make it based on the numbers, not on Dave’s trauma.

Run your own numbers

Wonder what this analysis looks like in your specific situation?  We built a calculator so you can run the numbers your self.  Just include your mortgage balance, your rate, your expected market return. See what it actually costs you. Then decide.

Mortgage Opportunity Cost Calculator

Mortgage Opportunity Cost Calculator

Compare paying the house off fast vs. taking the 30-year and investing the difference.
$
%
%
yrs
Drag to compare different payoff speeds 15 years
If paid off in 15 years
On a 30-year mortgage
Monthly cash freed up
Path A (Dave): pay off, then invest
Path B (The JD Investor): invest the difference
Opportunity cost of Dave’s plan
Path A — Dave Path B (The JD Investor) — invest the difference
Both paths commit the same monthly cash flow to “mortgage + investing” for 30 years. Returns are assumed constant and ignore taxes, fees, and sequence-of-returns risk. The math assumes you can stomach a market that doesn’t move in a straight line.

Footnote on methodology. Both paths assume the same monthly cash outlay sustained for thirty years. In Path A (Dave's way), the entire outlay is directed to the mortgage for fifteen years; once the house is paid off, the same dollar amount is redirected into investments for the remaining fifteen years. In Path B (the JD Investor's way), the borrower makes the standard thirty-year mortgage payment and invests the monthly difference for the full thirty years. Wealth is compared at year thirty, when both paths own the house outright.

Monthly mortgage payments use the standard fixed-rate amortization formula. Investment values are computed as the future value of an ordinary annuity, with monthly contributions compounded at one-twelfth the annual return. The model assumes constant returns and ignores taxes (including the mortgage interest deduction and capital gains treatment on the investment side), investment fees, inflation, market volatility, sequence-of-returns risk, and personal circumstances — all of which may materially affect results. Any single year of investing can, and will, deviate substantially from the long-run average; this comparison reflects long-run averages, not guarantees.

This calculator is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is based on the assumptions and inputs you provide. The results are hypothetical, do not reflect actual investment performance, and are not guarantees of future outcomes. They should not be considered personalized investment advice or a recommendation. Consult a qualified financial professional before making any financial decisions.

Share this post!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Information is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products, or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this post (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of Tim Corriero, an Investment Adviser Representative of Gemmer Asset Management LLC (“GAM”) and should not be regarded as the views of GAM, or a description of advisory services provided by GAM or performance returns of any GAM client.  References to securities or market-related performance data are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.  Any mention of a specific law firm herein does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by such firm.

Please see disclosures here.

Tim Corriero, J.D, CFP ©

Tim Corriero is an attorney, a Certified Financial Planner ® and founder of Juris Wealth, a financial advisory business for lawyers.

FREE EBOOK

My Personal Favorites

Thank you for your interest. A copy has been sent to your email address.